You are here:
  1. Home
  2. Risks & Protection
  3. Protection Strategies

Protection Strategies

Proactive, Reactive and Mechanical Defence

From risk assessment to rapid depressurisation, learn how to protect critical transformers and ensure continuity.

Assess Your Protection Strategy

Preventing transformer incidents is not only about stopping the initial fault — it is about preventing systemic escalation across interconnected assets.

Prevention: Avoiding Failures Before They Happen

Avoiding Faults Before They Happen

Risk Assessment & Engineering Studies
Site-specific risk assessments identify credible failure mechanisms, escalation pathways, and operational constraints (layout, access, outage windows, containment). This defines where prevention ends and where fast mechanical response becomes necessary.

Large power transformers (LPTs) are custom-built assets with long replacement lead times. When they fail, system operators may face prolonged unavailability, constrained capacity and complex recovery logistics.

Mitigation: Containing and Controlling Incidents

When prevention fails, the first milliseconds determine whether an incident remains local — or becomes catastrophic.

Protection strategies combine prevention, rapid mechanical response and consequence mitigation, designed around credible failure mechanisms and site constraints.

Early Detection

Identify potential abnormalities, detect incipient failures, and enable proactive action.

Isolation

Isolate affected equipment, specify containment zones, suppress escalation, and protect adjacent assets.

Containment

Activate directed power and trap energy at its source, limiting spread across the system.

Recovery

Restore the transformer to a safe state, minimize downtime, and protect system continuity.

Mechanical Protection: The Last Line of Defence

Fast Depressurisation Systems

First-response passive systems that rapidly relieve internal pressure, preventing tank rupture, explosion, and fire escalation.

Design & Compliance

Designed in alignment with applicable NFPA guidance where relevant, international best practices, and documented engineering methodologies.

Not All Mechanical Protection Systems Are Equivalent

Effective mechanical protection requires validated activation times, real-world fault testing, and proven performance across transformer sizes, configurations, and operating environments. Design claims without demonstrated activation and containment performance expose operators to residual catastrophic risk.

Best Practices & Normative Guidance

  • Transformer Explosion Risk
  • Transformer Fire Risk
  • Domino & Systemic Effects
  • See Relevant Industries

Engineering Criteria to Qualify a Transformer Protection Solution

For infrastructure operators, insurers and authorities, selecting a transformer protection solution requires objective engineering criteria — not marketing claims.

  • Full-scale or representative testing on oil-filled transformers
  • Validated simulations aligned with real internal fault events
  • Field installations on medium and large power transformers
  • Severe efficacy testing in qualified laboratories
  • Documented operational feedback over time

Selecting an unproven solution exposes operators to unquantified residual risk.

From Engineering Qualification to Defensible Protection Decisions

Once a protection solution has been technically qualified, the remaining question is not whether protection is desirable — but whether the selected solution can be defended when a real failure occurs.

SERGI supports infrastructure operators in moving from engineering qualification to defensible protection decisions, grounded in real operating conditions, documented performance, and physical failure mechanisms.

In critical infrastructure environments, defensible engineering decisions matter more than theoretical protection concepts.

Validate Your Protection Strategy with SERGI